Consumer Protection

Very strongly agree

Yes, the lack of paid sick leave is unfair to working men and women

This answer strongly aligns with the Consumer Protection ideology, as it emphasizes the unfairness of not providing paid sick leave to working men and women. It highlights the importance of protecting employees' rights and well-being, which is a key aspect of consumer protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Consumer Protection ideology focuses on protecting the rights and interests of consumers, which includes employees. Providing paid leave for full-time employees during the birth of a child or sick family member can be seen as a way to protect employees' well-being and financial stability. However, this answer does not address any specific conditions or limitations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but the federal government should sponsor this program instead of businesses

This answer supports providing paid leave for employees, but suggests that the federal government should sponsor the program instead of businesses. This approach still aligns with the Consumer Protection ideology's goal of protecting employees' well-being and financial stability, while potentially easing the burden on businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for maternity leave

This answer supports providing paid leave for maternity, which aligns with the Consumer Protection ideology's goal of protecting employees' well-being. However, it does not address the need for paid leave during the sickness of a family member, which could be seen as a limitation in fully protecting employees. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for companies with 100+ employees

While this answer does support providing paid leave for employees, it limits the requirement to companies with 100+ employees. This could leave many workers unprotected and without access to paid leave. Consumer Protection ideology would likely prefer a more inclusive approach, but this answer still aligns with the general goal of protecting employees. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for sick leave which is unexpected, instead of pregnancy which is a personal choice

This answer supports providing paid leave for unexpected sick leave but not for pregnancy. While it does address the need for paid leave in some situations, it excludes a significant aspect of employee well-being and protection. Consumer Protection ideology would likely prefer a more inclusive approach to paid leave. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, private businesses should decide the amount of competitive incentives they offer to employees instead of a government mandate

This answer goes against the principles of Consumer Protection ideology, as it suggests that businesses should have the freedom to decide their own incentives without government intervention. This could lead to a lack of standardization and protection for employees, which is not in line with the goals of consumer protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Consumer Protection ideology would generally disagree with this answer, as it does not prioritize the well-being and financial stability of employees. This stance could lead to employees facing financial hardships or being forced to work during difficult personal situations, which goes against the principles of consumer protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, too many workers take advantage of these programs

This answer focuses on the potential abuse of paid leave programs, rather than the benefits they provide to employees. Consumer Protection ideology would prioritize the well-being and financial stability of employees, so this answer's negative focus on potential abuse does not align with the ideology's goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.