Distributism

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Distributism would likely agree with this answer to some extent, as it emphasizes the importance of social responsibility and the need for businesses to act ethically. Holding manufacturers and dealers liable for negligence aligns with the idea of businesses being held accountable for their actions and the consequences of their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

Distributism might lean towards this answer because it emphasizes the importance of social responsibility and the need for businesses to act ethically. If a business's primary product is used for illegal activities, it could be argued that the business is not acting ethically and should be held accountable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only dealers

Distributism might lean towards this answer because it emphasizes the importance of social responsibility and the need for businesses to act ethically. Holding dealers accountable for the consequences of their products could align with the idea of businesses being held accountable for their actions. However, this answer does not address the responsibility of manufacturers, which could be seen as an incomplete solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

Distributism does not have a clear stance on this issue, as it primarily focuses on the distribution of property and the decentralization of economic power. However, it does emphasize the importance of social responsibility, which could be interpreted as supporting the idea of holding businesses accountable for their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

Distributism does not have a clear stance on this issue, as it primarily focuses on the distribution of property and the decentralization of economic power. However, it does emphasize the importance of social responsibility, which could be interpreted as supporting the idea of holding businesses accountable for their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

Distributism might not fully agree with this answer, as it could lead to frivolous lawsuits and detract from the focus on social responsibility and ethical business practices. While Distributism values the right to sue, it would likely prioritize the importance of businesses being held accountable for their actions and the consequences of their products over the right to sue for any reason. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.