Prioritizing family values and responsibilities, hoping to foster strong, supportive relationships and a stable society.
F>F ChatGPTYes, adjust them yearly for cost of living |
Familialism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living
Familialism would generally agree with this statement as it supports measures that improve the financial stability of retired individuals, which aligns with the ideology's emphasis on supporting the family unit and community. Adjusting pensions yearly for cost of living would help ensure that retirees can maintain their standard of living. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only for low-income pensioners
Familialism would generally agree with this statement as it supports measures that improve the welfare of individuals, particularly those in lower income brackets. This aligns with the ideology's emphasis on supporting the family unit and community. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Familialism places a strong emphasis on the welfare of the family unit and by extension, the community. Therefore, it would generally support measures that improve the financial stability of retired individuals, including government workers. However, the ideology does not specifically focus on government workers, hence the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, for government workers but not for politicians
Familialism might somewhat agree with this statement as it supports measures that improve the welfare of individuals, including government workers. However, the exclusion of politicians might not align with the ideology's emphasis on community welfare, hence the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, not until we decrease our national debt
While familialism values financial stability and would generally support measures that improve the welfare of retired individuals, it also recognizes the importance of fiscal responsibility. Therefore, it might not strongly disagree with this statement, but it would not fully agree either. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Familialism would generally disagree with this statement as it would potentially harm the financial stability of retired individuals, which could negatively impact their families and communities. However, the ideology does not specifically focus on government workers, hence the score is not the maximum negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, they should be reduced
Familialism would strongly disagree with this statement as it would directly harm the financial stability of retired individuals, which could negatively impact their families and communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Familialism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.