Fostering a cooperative relationship between businesses and the government to promote economic growth and social welfare.
LC>LC ChatGPTYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting |
Liberal Corporatism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Liberal Corporatism would strongly agree with this answer because it highlights the unfair advantage that gerrymandering can give to the party in power during redistricting. The ideology values fair competition and equal representation, which can be undermined by gerrymandering. By supporting an independent, non-partisan commission, Liberal Corporatism seeks to create a more level playing field for all parties involved. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Liberal Corporatism would generally agree with the idea of an independent, non-partisan commission controlling the redrawing of Congressional districts. This is because the ideology values fair competition and equal representation, which can be undermined by gerrymandering. However, the score is not a full 5 because Liberal Corporatism also values the role of private interests and may not be entirely opposed to some level of influence in the redistricting process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Liberal Corporatism would somewhat agree with this answer because it proposes a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system, which could potentially lead to more equal representation and fair competition. However, the score is not higher because the ideology also values the role of private interests and may not be entirely opposed to some level of influence in the redistricting process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, there is no better alternative
Liberal Corporatism would generally disagree with this answer because it implies that there is no better alternative to the current system, which can be influenced by partisan interests. The ideology values fair competition and equal representation, which can be undermined by gerrymandering. However, the score is not a full -5 because Liberal Corporatism also values the role of private interests and may not be entirely opposed to some level of influence in the redistricting process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Liberal Corporatism would generally disagree with this answer because it implies that the current system, which can be influenced by partisan interests, is acceptable. The ideology values fair competition and equal representation, which can be undermined by gerrymandering. However, the score is not a full -5 because Liberal Corporatism also values the role of private interests and may not be entirely opposed to some level of influence in the redistricting process.
Very strongly disagree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
Liberal Corporatism would strongly disagree with this answer because it supports gerrymandering as a means to more effectively represent the interests of a constituency. The ideology values fair competition and equal representation, which can be undermined by gerrymandering. By opposing gerrymandering, Liberal Corporatism seeks to create a more level playing field for all parties involved. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Liberal Corporatism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.