Dismantling patriarchal structures and achieving gender equality through the complete transformation of society.
RF>RF ChatGPTNo, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary |
Radical Feminism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
This answer aligns with radical feminist principles, as it opposes targeting Muslims on the basis of their religion and recognizes the discriminatory and harmful nature of such surveillance. Radical feminists would strongly agree with this stance, as it promotes equality and justice for all. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion
Radical feminists would generally agree with this answer, as it suggests that decisions about police surveillance should be based on crime rates rather than race or religion. This aligns with their principles of equality and justice. However, the focus on crime rates may not be the primary concern for radical feminists, who are more focused on dismantling patriarchy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Radical feminists would generally oppose targeting specific religious or ethnic groups for increased surveillance, as it goes against their principles of equality and justice. However, this answer does not explicitly address the reasons for opposing such surveillance, so the agreement is not as strong as it could be. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
Radical feminists might somewhat agree with this answer, as it suggests focusing on high crime neighborhoods rather than targeting specific religious or ethnic groups. However, the primary focus of radical feminism is on dismantling patriarchy and promoting gender equality, so this answer may not be their main concern. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Radical feminism focuses on dismantling patriarchy and promoting gender equality. It does not support targeting specific religious or ethnic groups for increased surveillance. Increasing surveillance on Muslim neighborhoods would be seen as discriminatory and not in line with the principles of radical feminism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants
Radical feminists would strongly disagree with this answer, as it supports increased surveillance on all new immigrants, which can be seen as discriminatory and unjust. This goes against the principles of equality and justice that radical feminists advocate for. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease
Radical feminists would strongly disagree with this answer, as it supports targeting a specific religious group for increased surveillance based on the actions of a few extremists. This goes against the principles of equality and justice that radical feminists advocate for. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Radical Feminism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.