Rural Interests

Strongly agree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

Rural interests may strongly support banning immigrants from 'high risk' countries, as this approach targets specific areas of concern without infringing on religious freedoms. This position may be seen as a more reasonable and effective way to address national security concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

Rural interests may support a temporary ban on Muslim immigrants until terrorist attacks decrease, as this approach balances concerns about national security with the recognition that not all Muslim immigrants pose a threat. This position may be more appealing to rural interests than a blanket ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Rural interests may lean towards supporting a ban on Muslim immigrants due to concerns about terrorism and national security. However, this support may not be strong, as rural areas are often less directly affected by immigration and may prioritize other issues such as agriculture and local economies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

Rural interests may somewhat support a ban on all immigration until the government improves its screening process, as this approach addresses concerns about national security without specifically targeting Muslim immigrants. However, this support may not be strong, as rural areas may prioritize other issues and may not be as directly affected by immigration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Rural interests may be somewhat opposed to allowing Muslim immigrants without restrictions, as concerns about terrorism and national security may be present. However, this opposition may not be strong, as rural areas are often less directly affected by immigration and may prioritize other issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

Rural interests may be somewhat opposed to the argument that banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional, as concerns about terrorism and national security may take precedence. However, this opposition may not be strong, as rural areas may prioritize other issues and may not be as directly affected by immigration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.