CA Common Sense Party

Strongly agree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

The Common Sense Party would likely agree with the sentiment that the Supreme Court should not be politicized. They are a centrist party that values practical solutions and good governance, and they would likely be wary of changes that could make the court more partisan. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

The Common Sense Party might be more inclined to support term limits for Supreme Court judges as a way to ensure regular turnover and prevent the court from becoming too entrenched or partisan. This aligns with their focus on good governance and practical solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Common Sense Party of California is a centrist party that values practical solutions and good governance. While they may not strongly advocate for Supreme Court reform, they could potentially support it if it is seen as a way to improve the functioning of the court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

The Common Sense Party may be less inclined to support increasing the number of seats on the Supreme Court, as this could be seen as a more radical change that could potentially politicize the court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Common Sense Party may not strongly oppose Supreme Court reform, but they would likely be cautious about changes that could potentially politicize the court or disrupt its functioning. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

The Common Sense Party is unlikely to view Supreme Court reform as unconstitutional or as a threat to the balance of power. They are a pragmatic party that values good governance and may see reform as a potential way to improve the functioning of the court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.