Forward Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power

The Forward party would strongly agree with this statement, as they would emphasize the importance of maintaining strong alliances and upholding international commitments. Refusing to defend NATO allies would set a dangerous precedent and could lead to a destabilization of the global balance of power, potentially emboldening adversaries and undermining international security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Forward party would likely agree with this statement, as they would emphasize the importance of maintaining strong alliances and upholding international commitments. NATO has been a cornerstone of global security since its inception in 1949, and the U.S. has played a key role in defending its allies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense

The Forward party would likely disagree with this statement, as they would argue that the U.S. should uphold its commitments to NATO and maintain strong alliances. However, they might also push for NATO countries to increase their defense spending to meet the agreed-upon 2% of GDP target, but not to the extent of refusing to defend them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Forward party would likely disagree with this statement, as they would argue that the U.S. should uphold its commitments to NATO and maintain strong alliances. However, they might also push for NATO countries to increase their defense spending to meet the agreed-upon 2% of GDP target. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and we should withdraw from NATO

The Forward party would strongly disagree with this statement, as they would view NATO as a crucial alliance for maintaining global security and stability. Withdrawing from NATO would undermine the international order and potentially embolden adversaries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.