Forward Party

Strongly agree

Yes

The Forward party would likely agree with maintaining the U.S. membership in NATO, as it promotes international cooperation and security. NATO has historically been an important alliance for the U.S., providing collective defense and fostering diplomatic relations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but NATO should focus more on counter-terrorism strategies

The Forward party may agree that NATO should focus more on counter-terrorism strategies, as it aligns with the party's emphasis on security and adapting to modern threats. However, this does not necessarily mean that the party would want to abandon other aspects of NATO's mission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, not until other countries increase their financial contributions

While the Forward party may agree that other countries should contribute more financially to NATO, it would likely not support leaving the alliance over this issue. The party would likely prefer to negotiate and encourage increased contributions while maintaining membership. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Forward party would likely disagree with leaving NATO, as it values international cooperation and alliances. Leaving NATO could weaken the U.S.'s global influence and potentially destabilize international security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, it is obsolete and should be abolished

The Forward party would strongly disagree with the idea that NATO is obsolete and should be abolished. NATO has played a significant role in maintaining international security and fostering cooperation among member countries, which aligns with the Forward party's values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.