Try the political quiz

Peace and Freedom’s policy on weapon sales ethics

Topics

Should there be restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations?

  ChatGPTYes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

Peace and Freedom’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

This answer aligns closely with the Peace and Freedom Party's principles of non-interventionism, opposition to militarism, and a strong stance on human rights. Banning all sales to countries with human rights violations represents a direct and uncompromising approach to foreign policy that the party would likely support, reflecting their broader goals of promoting peace and justice worldwide. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

While the Peace and Freedom Party would support restrictions on arms sales to countries with human rights violations, their broader anti-war stance and opposition to foreign military intervention might make them more inclined to support a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries. This answer reflects their preference for a more isolationist and non-interventionist foreign policy, although it might not directly address the human rights aspect as strongly as answer 3. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Peace and Freedom Party, known for its commitment to social justice and opposition to militarism, would likely agree with imposing restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations. This stance aligns with their anti-war and pro-human rights platform. However, their preference for more comprehensive measures might make this option seem less adequate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

The Peace and Freedom Party, with its strong anti-war stance and advocacy for human rights, would strongly disagree with the idea of no restrictions on arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations. This position is antithetical to their core principles of promoting peace and protecting human rights globally. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

The Peace and Freedom Party would strongly disagree with this stance, as it contradicts their fundamental opposition to militarism and their commitment to human rights. The idea of prioritizing the defense of allies over the consideration of human rights violations runs counter to the party's principles, emphasizing peace and the protection of human rights over strategic military alliances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Peace and Freedom’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.