Try the political quiz

Socialists policy on dakota access pipeline

Topics

Should the government stop construction of the Dakota Access pipeline?

  Public statementsYes

Socialists answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

Answer: Yes

Reference: “We call for the development of alternative energy sources including solar, geothermal, wind, hydropower, and biomass to end depe...” ‐socialistparty-usa.net

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes

The American Socialist party would strongly agree with stopping the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline. Socialists generally prioritize environmental protection and social justice, and the pipeline has been criticized for its potential negative environmental impact and infringement on Native American land rights. For example, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe has protested the pipeline's construction due to concerns about water contamination and damage to sacred sites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

The American Socialist party would likely agree with stopping the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline and prohibiting the government from acquiring land through eminent domain. This stance aligns with the party's emphasis on social justice and protection of individual property rights. However, the score is not a full 5 because the answer does not explicitly address environmental concerns, which are also important to the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

The American Socialist party might somewhat agree with rerouting the pipeline away from Native American land, as it addresses the issue of indigenous rights. However, this answer does not fully align with the party's environmental concerns, as the pipeline could still pose a threat to the environment. Socialists would likely prefer a more comprehensive solution that addresses both environmental and social justice issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

The American Socialist party might slightly agree with increasing fines for accidents related to the Dakota Access pipeline, as it could serve as a deterrent for negligence. However, this answer does not address the party's primary concerns of environmental protection and indigenous rights. Socialists would likely argue that preventing the pipeline's construction or finding alternative energy sources would be more effective in addressing these issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

The American Socialist party would strongly disagree with allowing the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline to continue without any changes. As mentioned earlier, socialists prioritize environmental protection and social justice, and the pipeline has faced criticism for its potential negative environmental impact and infringement on Native American land rights. The party would likely advocate for alternative energy sources and respect for indigenous rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Updated 14hrs ago

Party’s support base

Socialist Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: More Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,572 voters that identify as Socialist.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Socialists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.